![]() |
| Watercolour showing people dancing and playing instruments' Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1931.38.28) |
![]() |
| Figure 1. 'Red silk kumin-potloi [dance skirt] embellished with sequins, glass beads, mirrors and appliqué'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1946.5.76). |
![]() |
| Figure 2. 'Green silk kumin-potloi [dance skirt] embellished with sequins, glass beads, mirrors and appliqué'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1983.5.2). |
Artefact acquisitions and diplomatic gifting are rooted in unequal power dynamics of transcultural encounters – in the context of the objects discussed, it is not known how the costumes were obtained, whether they played any role in gift-centered diplomacy, personal interactions, or reassurances. Reid and Ellis were influential bureaucrats; they may have witnessed these costumes being worn by dancers, or were aware that these costumes carried local aesthetic, symbolic, and spiritual meanings. In colonial South Asia, gift economy and procurement of unique objects were common practice amongst the elite ranks. Had there been more information, the journeys of personal souvenirs would have been insightful for narratives on colonial collecting. By contextualising the dance costumes from Manipur as independent, agential objects, this account is interested in unarchiving histories of performance cultures from the region of Manipur held at the Pitt Rivers Museum collections. In doing so, it aims to resurrect the dancers who have been absent from the archives. It recovers a means to locate anthropology of clothing and material culture within histories of colonial collecting in the region, especially by the civil servants who graduated from the university.
Provisionally assembling on a flattened surface while envisioning the body of an absent dancer, the costumes brim with potential to imagine centuries-old dance form come alive. The ‘dancer’s wardrobe’ in red [Reid, 1946.5.74 - 1946.5.81], and ‘woman's dance costume’ in green [Ellis, 1983.5.1 - 1983.5.5] could momentarily allow the observer to envision bodies in motion. The costumes are a diverse ensemble of textures and fabrics for a performer in Meitei rituals. Up till early 20th century, these kinds of skirts were worn in Lai Haraoba, an annual propitiatory ritual to honour Meitei lai-s, their divinities. Similarly costumed dancers appear in red and green skirts in a painting of Lai Haraoba [1931.38.28] in the museum’s collection. It is a lively depiction of a community ritual comprising several other women and priestesses in sarongs, men, balladeers, drummers and umbrella carriers in various states of motion. It was bequeathed by anthropologist John Henry Hutton (1885-1968) who was educated at the Worcester College and had spent a greater part of his career as a civil servant in the Assam-Burma region.
![]() |
| Figure 3. 'Watercolour showing people dancing and playing instruments' Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1931.38.28). |
![]() |
| Figure 4. 'Group of women and girls posed for a portrait' Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1998.216.23.1). |
The existence of white textiles with silvery patterns delicately stitched to the beaded and metalwork borders indicate that these costume sets were procured as artefacts worn by dancers in Raas Leela - a ritual to honour the Hindu divinity Krishna. In Raas Leela, the ensemble worn by women is called kumin-potloi. The design of the potloi was conceived by the Meitei monarch Meidingu Chingthangkhomba, also known as Maharaja Bheigya Chandra (1748-1799); some sources mention an artisan named Sanakhya Sanajaoba who crafted the ornamental costume (Chanu 2022). The monarch’s exposure to cultures beyond his kingdom, such as the ghagra (a flared skirt) from northern parts of India, may have influenced an alteration of the embroidered Meitei phanek into what became the potloi ensemble. In everyday life and other Meitei rituals, women and girls tie locally woven phanek– a colonial-era photograph show an ethnographic and amateur interest in Munipuri women & girls [Fig. 4 1998.216.23.1]. The subjects and the photographer remain unknown. Phanek of various shades with dark stripes are worn in two distinct styles; if the difference in their age does not indicate, the styles in which the fabric is worn designate their matrimonial status. The potloi for Raas Leela was designed to stand apart from a phanek, as well as erase most features that distinguish various social markers of dancer-devotees participating in the Raas Leela.
| Figure 5. 'Dancer-devotees in kumin-potloi ensemble at Raas Leela at Konung, Imphal, 2015'. Photo by author. |
![]() |
| Figure 6. 'Detail of Poshwan, overskirt of loosely woven metallic thread and cotton, with heavily embellished band of red fabric at the hem'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford (1983.5.1) |
![]() |
| Figure 7. Poshwan (1946.5.77), khaon (1946.5.79) and other fragments of Reid's gift. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford. |
The two skirts conserved by the Pitt Rivers Museum differ in colour, craftsmanship, and materials used. Both skirts are earlier versions of cylindrical-shaped, fully sequined and stiffened skirts that are designed in the present times. They are similar to each other in cut and shape. They are slimmer towards the top edge and flare out at the bottom. From the late 18th century, the task of making these were bestowed upon Phiribi Loishang - a guild of artisans and women presided by the Meitei queen (Devi 2010). They were tasked with producing potloi-s, along with caring for other pieces of costumes worn by deities in the rituals and also oversaw the practice of the leeba – the appliqué designs that are masterfully crafted along the lower rim of the potloi. Local flora and fauna symbolism is sewn into the potloi. The Meitei deity Pakhangba often visualised as a mighty dragon-like form, or lithe serpentine pattern is also believed to be connoted in the body of potloi “divided into dorsal, ventral and stomach” of the entity; the “patterns embroidered on potloi represent the scales of the snake” (Chabungbam 2018, 67-68). The embroidered design at the lower rim with bright red swirls on the red skirt are in the pattern of khoi mayek - a traditional Meitei motif depicting bees or fishhooks, seen in other textiles of ceremonial and everyday use. One of the striking components of the other fragments of the costumes are brass sequins called kon. The edge of the green skirt is decorated with mirrors of various sizes held by brass sequins - this is a design that is not commonly seen. The white cloth stitched at the hem carry an inscription marked in pencil: MANIPURI RAS GIRL.
![]() |
| Figure 8. 'Detail red silk kumin-potloi (dance skirt) of a Manipuri Ras Girl (1983.5.2)'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford. |
![]() |
| Figure 9. 'Close up of khaon (1946.5.79)'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford. |
![]() |
| Figure 10. 'Close up kon on khaon (1983.5.4)'. Copyright Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford. |
While consulting the kumin-potloi at the Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, I analysed what the costume represents. I wrote : “A potloi is always associated with ideals of restraint, femininity, and piety. It is worn by Meitei Hindu brides at their weddings as well as by female dancers in rituals and on stage. The kumin’s length can be adjusted and must cover the wearer’s ankles; a velvet reshom-phurit is worn as a shirt above. The costume iconography signals deep ties with nature. The green kumin, representing the hue of nature herself, is worn by Radha Raaseshwori and Chandrabali—Krishna’s principal companions in Raas Leela. The other dancers, the gopi, are Krishna’s friends, lovers, messengers, mothers, and companions. They wear red and symbolise longing for divine union. The diaphanous maikhum, veiling the face, signifies unwavering devotion. The white thabakyet binding the chest conceals the figure, desexualises the body, and expresses modesty. A silvery tassel, chubarei, attached to a conical koktumbi atop the head, represents cascading rivers. The patterned, white poshwan, worn in waves around the waist, symbolises the seven seas described in Hindu mythology. Pieces of gold- hued jewellery on the neck and arms shimmer as the dancer moves. The costume can be seen as a resplendent tribute to the natural world” (Biswas 2025).
The skirt is not tailored to fit any one dancer - it’s height can be altered to fit multiple dancers while rest of the ornaments can also be used by more than one. These pieces are made by professional artisans called potloi-setpa/setpi in a craft learnt through apprenticeship as well as succession. In Manipur and amongst Meitei diaspora, the kumin-potloi remains a living, wearable heritage. Knowledge, care and respect are embedded in the artisanry. Poet Linthoi Chanu ascribes a feminist, resileint methodology to the meticulous labour of crafting a potloi for female bodies and recounts how women in her family intergenrationally sustained the artisanry to aid themselves, their kin and community (2022). The costume fragments in the collections represent the ardous labour of the dreamer, the makers, and the dancers, and the evolving relationship between a dancing body and an extraordinary object imbued with traces of old customs.
![]() |
| Figure 11. 'At a master artisan's workshop. Imphal, 2015'. Photo by author. |
Could the costumes by themselves offer an invitation to redress the unequal power dynamics of colonialism in the region? Perhaps not. It may offer to regain an insight into how the materiality of the object is entangeld with the social, cultural and spiritual, and if dance can be unarchived from colonial collections in a meaningful way. Historically, narratives on arts practice and practitioners from this region of South Asia, i.e., Manipur and its surrounding region now termed as the Indian Northeast – have suffered from marginalisation, occlusion even exclusion in colonial and postcolonial narratives. Usually, decorative arts from this region have not been curated in any “South Asia” focussed exhibitions in the UK. Except one. In 2017, the Alford Manor House Museum in Lincolnshire displayed reproductions of royal robes from a black and white photograph of Maharaja Sir Churachand Singh (r.1885-1941) and Maharani Dhanamanjuri Devi (ca 1886-1975). The exhibition The Maharaja’s New Clothes was put together by textile historian Toolika Gupta, designer Richana Khumanthem and the Maharaja’s grandson, film and media curator L. Somi Roy. Every piece of the costume was shipped from Manipur and India. Incidentally, the Alford Manor House has been the family home of John Comyn Higgins (1882 – 1952), a Political Agent for the Manipur State (1917-1933), and also a graduate of the Brasenose College. He was known to have raised the Manipur Labour Corps to aid France during the First World War and remained an influential colonial administrator in the Assam-Burma region.
![]() |
| Figure 12. 2011EV9383. Copyright Victoria and Albert Museum, Asia Collections. |
![]() |
| Figure 13. 2011EV9383 magnified. Copyright Victoria and Albert Museum, Asia Collections. |
The Ras Girl is absent. Their embodied knowledge, their movements as well as the sites of performance are absent in the archive. Committed to situating dancers who came before our times as well as the intangible narratives nestled in visual and material cultures, I find them again in the Victoria and Albert Museum, in red and green, holding hands in a gouache by an anonymous artist (ca.1900). This painting of two Manipuri dancing girls, like the rest of the objects discussed here, was bequeathed by an alumnus of University of Oxford, Balliol College to be specific; he later became a chancellor – George Curzon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston (1859 – 1925), and remains a controversial figure as the Viceroy of India. One of the ways to think about material culture in a decolonial context, as demonstrated in this strand of inquiry, is to study personal memoribilia that could de‘objecti’ify dance through museological routes. By engaging with objects and arts from the Manipur region scattered across various collections, this is a step to find new ways of recognising, thinking, and writing about performance cultures from colonial-era South Asia.
REFERENCES:
Biswas, D. 2025. ‘Unarchiving Performance, Materials, Fragilities’, Museum of Archaeology and
Anthropology Digilab, https://www.maadigitallab.org/blog/2025/09/16/unarchiving-
performance-materials-fragilities/
Chabungbam Babina Devi. 2018. Embodied Culture And Its Contestations: A Study Of Manipuri Jagoi
Raas, Unpublished MPhil diss. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University
Chanu, L. 2022. Potloi – A Legacy. https://hynews.in/article/your_story/potloi-a-legacy-by-
linthoi-chanu/3147
Devi, J. 2010. Cultural History of Manipur - Sija Laioibi and the Maharas. New Delhi: Mittal
Publications
Gupta, T. 2018. ‘Manipur Maharaja’s New Clothes at The Alford Manor House Museum,
Lincolnshire, UK’, Textiles and Clothing Research Centre e-Journal 2 (4): 32-35.
https://www.tcrc.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/v2i4-Article-6_TG.pdf
AUTHOR:
Dr. Debanjali Biswas is an Early Career Researcher in cultural anthropology and theatre, performance and dance studies. Drawing on ethnographic, archival and practice-as-research methods, her work explores performance cultures as sites of contestation, affect and agency. Besides dancing Manipuri for close to three decades, her primary area of field research has been Manipur (India). This blogpost emerges from the British Academy SRG funded project ‘Unarchiving Dance: Interpreting Colonial Visual Cultures of Manipur, 1891-1949’. She has previously worked at the Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford (C&RD).




.jpg.jpeg)



















